EDITORIALS
The Pitch – A Review By The Most Annoyed AdMan In The World
I certainly can’t call myself the most interesting ad man in the world. But then again, neither could half of the “professionals” in the first episode of The Pitch, a new AMC show that delves inside the gritty world of advertising.
Now, before I continue, there are more spoilers in this review than there are spineless wonders in the average account department. There’s just no way around it, folks. To say what has to be said, I have to reveal all.
So if you haven’t seen it yet, don’t read this before you watch the episode below. (If you have seen it, and thought the outcome was well deserved, don’t read this either. Instead, go and work for a crappy client like Subway. You’ll like it better over there.)
OK, so the premise of the show is simple enough. Take one big client, put two agencies on the pitch, and give them less than a week to come up with brilliance. (We’ll get to the “brilliance” in a moment.)
The first episode of The Pitch pits two agencies against each other – McKinney, a mid-sized shop from North Carolina, and WDCW (formerly WongDoody) from Los Angeles. And the massive account they’re pitching for? Subway, the largest fast food chain in the world, with pockets deep enough to match.
The task was one with plenty of meat: aim Subway’s new breakfasts at the 18-24 crowd.
The rotund marketing director from the ‘bway said he wanted something that wasn’t SOS (Same Old Subway). Something big, bold, different, clever, original. You know, the usual manure clients spout before they crap all over your ideas and ask for SOS (Same Old Shit). The two agencies eagerly took notes before running back to the office to be inspired. Tricky, considering they took the brief from a bunch of lifeless corporate yawns in a room that would make an unfinished basement look glamorous.
Now to be fair, the show is somewhat entertaining to anyone in our industry. It can’t help but be involving; we live and breathe this stuff. To others, it’s probably in the same zone as The Apprentice. They don’t really give a shit about the process, they just want to see a train wreck.
Both WDCW and McKinney seem like typical agencies, filled with the usual mix of wannabe rock-star creatives, overdressed account execs, and the owners who jump in at the last minute to fuck things up.
But watching the process, it was clear from the beginning that one agency knew exactly what they were doing, and the other one was flailing around in the deep end. McKinney were way out of their league here.
After some laughable brainstorming sessions from McKinney, two “stellar” ideas rose to the top, much like shit floats in the toilet.
The first, pitched by an annoying drama-queen copywriter with aspirations of mediocrity, revolved around Subway’s sandwiches getting some kind of makeover on a reality talk show. The host is a sandwich. The audience is a sandwich.
Oh God. Shoot me now.
The insipid script was the last nail in that idea’s coffin, with puerile lines like:
“Welcome back to let’s fix breakfast. Today we’re going to make over Jenny’s breakfast. Here’s what Jenny used to eat…”
and (prepare for a douche chill moment)
“Are you ready to see what Jenny’s breakfast looks like now?! GIRL, you are lookin’ flavorized.”
At this point I wanted to crawl in a hole and die. But I was too busy laughing.
The second idea wasn’t an idea at all. The creative team found a video online of some cretin called MacLethal (arghhh) who got 9 million views for rapping about breakfast.
Flash of genius follows – “Hey, he got 9 million views. He’s rapping about breakfast. Young people love rapping. They love breakfast. He’s already popular. HOME RUN!”
Yeah, right.
Then, they let this chunky Eminem wannabe write the whole song, presumably while they sit and sweat in a corner of the office as they realize one devastating fact: the whole idea was a loser from the beginning, but they sold the fucking thing in.
WDCW, on the other hand, were very different.
They hit on an idea that had legs. In fact, the legs had legs. The basic idea was that we’re all brain-dead zombies in the morning, especially the target audience. As a former 20-year old college student who rarely saw 11am, I know just what they mean.
So, they coined the phrase “zAMbies” and came up with some nice work to go with it. Great images of drooling teens with half-eaten McMuffins hanging out of their gormless mouths. There were some fun, irreverent lines aimed at those morons:
No be zAMbie
Eat this. No feel bad.
And scripts that had some real fun.
“LOOK, talking words.
You breakfast zambie?
You no think about where go breakfast?
Just grab brown circle food because fast?
Stop do.
Go Subway.
No be zambie!”
The usual rounds of changes were made internally, then they all hopped on a plane to face the firing squad at Subway.
To say the presentation by McKinney started badly is being kind. It was clear the stupid “Let’s fix breakfast” ideas was falling flat. Nice line, but rotten execution. The crickets and tumbleweeds in the pitch room confirmed my feelings that this was possibly one of the worst ideas in the history of shitty ideas. Subway’s marketing bores couldn’t crack a smile.
Then they brought out the rapping “idea” and it went down well. Not great, but well. Of course, it didn’t hurt that they filmed it in a Subway restaurant. Gotta get the client’s product in. They also brought MacLethal in to do a live freestyle rap. I fastforwarded that part, my brain was hurting.
WDCW went second, with their one solid idea. It killed. Killed. The Subway crowd loved it. And making these hollow vessels laugh is beyond tricky.
The pitch was in the bag for Tracy Wong.
That was until one stereotypical client bitch pipes up about there not being enough product shots in the work. My heart sank. I knew it was all over. I’ve been there. You’ve been there. That small seed of doubt becomes a giant beanstalk of failure.
What followed next, we won’t really know. The hours of debate, butchering ideas and shitting on work, was not shown in the episode. All we saw was Subway’s Mr. Fatman announcing to McKinney that their shitty idea (which was basically “let’s re-do this YouTube video”) had won. They had the account, WDCW’s risk-taking and originality was rewarded with a trip home empty handed.
A crying fucking shame.
And that, ladies and gentleman, is what is so teeth-grindingly annoying about this show. It builds you up and drops you on your ass. And it shows, once again, that clients don’t want what they ask for. They think they want brave, but they don’t. They think they want original, but not even close. They want “safe with a new twist.” I mean seriously, a guy rapping about breakfast? That’s about as cool as those 80s Wendy’s training videos.
What’s even more ironic is that the chubby marketing guy called out WDCW for their former work on Quizno’s, using singing cats. That was, in effect, something “inspired” by online content. I wasn’t keen on it to be honest. But WDCW clearly took that to heart and went completely original. Then Subway hands the account to the dimwits from NC who do exactly the same thing – borrowing from pop culture.
Infuriating.
Will I be watching The Pitch again? Yes. Because I’m a real fucking glutton for punishment, and although I know the best work has no chance of winning, I dare to dream that in one of the episodes, justice will be done.
Tracy Wong and team, if you’re reading this, you clearly deserved the win. The online poll they’re doing at AMC also shows a vast majority of people thought you should have won, too. Take heart in that.
McKinney, you lucky fucks, please think about how you can turn your winning turd into something that doesn’t suck.
And Subway. You don’t deserve a good ad agency. You deserve Jared.
---
Felix is a site contributor, ranter and curmudgeon for The Denver Egotist. He’s been in the ad game a long time, but he’s still young enough to know he doesn’t know everything. He's been known, on occasion, to drink alcohol by the gallon. Do as he says, not as he does.

Comments
This episode made me doubt my inner creativity. zAMbies won me over and I'm firmly planted in the target audience, I'm a 20[.98] year old student. I'm glad that my gut was correct and I'm not alone in sharing the knowledge of the fact that WDCW killed it. At least they got some solid publicity from this and hopefully creative eyes will look to them for business in the future (at least over McKinney).
Shameless plug... follow me on twitter @kenrearley
I agree that WDCW had the better idea.
But I think the show is far better than I had anticipated. That they didn't edit out the internal teams pitching ideas that sucked and that the agency management didn't like was interesting.
There was enough that makes me want to keep tuning in.
i'll be watching on 4-30.. it really is a very intriguing show. hopefully the clients in upcoming shows go with creativity and execution.
I liked WDCW's idea of zAMbies. I thought it fight the target market well. Those ads would have caught my attention, and I'm pretty sure MacLethal wouldn't have. Not to mention that zombies are a huge pop culture topic right now for the college demographic. Look at the movies that have come out, books, video games, as well as the games students are organizing on campuses nationwide. Talk about a big miss on organizing an event like this for themselves (Subway) or even sponsoring one. Give out some free sandwiches, make a nearby Subway a meeting point. There is a ton to expand on.
oops meant fit not fight
I loved zAMbies and Subway really confused me with awarding McKinney.
It would make sense to award the "safest" idea when both agencies bring something that simply wouldn't work for the brand or target audience. But this wasn't the case. McKinney created two sloppy ideas and WDCW created a bold, funny and strategically minded concept.
Maybe there's a better idea than zAMbie but "Let's fix breakfest" or "Mac Lethal" aren't better ideas. This isn't even a creative issue, its a strategy issue.
McKinney had very little thought or strategy with their ideas.
WDCW had a more "risky" and less "traditional" idea but it was attached to a cultural theme within the demographic and never strayed from the brief. If they felt, zAMbies won't align with the brand then don't award the business to either shop!
As creatives, we really need to get better at selling our creativity. If your work is really good, let it stand for itself. But what many creatives lack is the ability to strategically justify a piece. When you're in a pitch, you're speaking with men and women who look at line graphs, spreadsheets and pie charts all day. They don't know who banksys is or ever plan on attending Coachella.
Its your Dad in the boardroom, not your sorority sister. It shouldn't have to be this way, but its almost inevitable. If you have brilliant account people who are masters of selling creative, talk to HR and give them a raise. You're better off foregoing a pay increase.
Seriously, go do it. Wash their car, babysit their kids buy them lunch.
We need strong account people.
Felix, or whatever your name is.
This article could not have been a more revealing look into your bitter, unaccomplished, armchair, wannabe "adman" brain.
Thinking the zAMbie idea was a good idea, is a very sophomoric reaction. Of course you would think that way. Until you consider all the horrendous factors: zombies are unappetizing, zombies are beyond overplayed in pop-culture right now, and would make Subway look like they were cashing in on a horribly exploited concept.
Referring to a highly respected rapper with almost 60 million views on YouTube as a "wannabe Eminem," simply because he's white, proves how shortsighted and out of touch you are.
I imagine your experiences in the advertising world have been quite embarrassing. You arguing and moaning with clients about how brilliant your ideas are, getting shot down, fired, resorting to writing blogs about people who are out there in the playing field, actually doing it. Calling yourself an "AdMan." Suuuure ya are buddy.
This is a pretty pathetic article, dude. If you actually knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't be blogging. You'd be a fixture in the ad world, instead of blogging for The St Louis Egotist. The most unimportant blog ever.
@Typical - He actually blogs for the Denver Egotist and, believe it or not, is a fixture in the ad world there: http://www.thedenveregotist.com/members/felix - they are kind enough to let us repost his many, conversation-sparking editorials.
Regardless, we want to thank you for taking the time and effort to leave a multi-paragraph comment on the most unimportant blog ever.
I am an advertising major at UT and you stole the words right from my mouth. It is depressing watching these great ideas get shot down.
The Waste Management episode pissed me off more than anything. The winning agency basically made the consumer feel like they were wasteful and just threw crap out all time for someone else to pick it up. Not to mention the retarded slogan "Turn waste into WOW"-- wow real genius right there.
Vs. the other agency that made the consumer feel like they were a part of something bigger than themselves. Consumers enjoy doing things that seem selfless especially if it is making a difference in the world. The idea of association a trashcan... with TRASH CAN make a difference. People like puzzles, to figure out the bigger meaning.
NOW Subway... I love how that guy was so fat and marketing Subway HA! Now 18-24 yr old market to go eat breakfast? I am 19... there is no way that some stupid rap song, which is the farthest thing from funny is going to get my ass up for breakfast. zAMbies was hilarious, funny, and TRUE. It could have been played off of and parodied.
BUT whatever, like you said, clients play it safe.
Score 2 for zAMbies in the target audience. 0 for
@The St. Louis Egotist
You guys are actually pretty cool. I'm thankful for sites like this one as an up-and-coming "AdMan".
Just as an FYI, Mac Lethal is pretty cool but he has almost 44 million views on YouTube 43,744,435 to be exact a/o the time of this posting.
Up&Comer
-Ken
Post new comment